View Current

Rules Governing Awards and Programs

This is not a current document. It has been repealed and is no longer in force.

Section 1 - Introduction

(1) These Rules are made by Council in accordance with the provisions of the University of Newcastle Act 1989 (NSW) and are part of the legislative framework established by Council to manage, in this instance the awards and programs offered by the University. Related Rules and other policy documents are listed under Essential Supporting Documents and Related Documents.

Top of Page

Section 2 - Purpose

(2) The purpose of these Rules is to prescribe the establishment, quality assurance, revision, discontinuation and disestablishment of awards and programs at the University of Newcastle. These Rules also prescribe the responsibilities of the University in accordance with the Australian Qualifications Framework (AQF), including delivery of learning outcomes, volume of learning and compliance monitoring.

(3) These Rules:

  1. are an essential part of the delegations framework operated by University officers and bodies to create, establish or amend awards and programs of the University;
  2. represent the University’s commitment to promoting legislative compliance; and
  3. demonstrate the University’s commitment to promoting the highest standards of academic knowledge and protecting the integrity of its awards and programs.

(4) Policies and Procedures supporting these Rules are developed in accordance with the University of Newcastle Policy Framework.

(5) In the event of an inconsistency between lower level policy documents and a Rule(s) or Schedule to the Rule(s), the Rule(s) made by Council prevails to the extent of the inconsistency.

(6) In the event of an inconsistency between an Academic Senate policy document and a Faculty policy, procedure or guideline, the policy document of Academic Senate prevails to the extent of the inconsistency.

Top of Page

Section 3 - Scope

(7) These Rules apply to all awards and programs created, established and offered by the University of Newcastle.

Top of Page

Section 4 - Awards – Qualification Types

(8) Specific award qualification requirements, including the volume of learning, are listed in the relevant Award and Program Schedule.

(9) Students enrolled in a program of study that they are unable to complete may be eligible to apply for and receive an Exit Award if they have completed the relevant program requirements.

(10) Students who have received an Exit Award and seek to undertake further study will be required to re-apply for admission. Re-admission may not be available in all programs.

Top of Page

Section 5 - Program – Qualification

(11) Academic Senate is authorised to:

  1. amend the Schedules to these Rules;
  2. determine which programs will be conferred ‘with distinction’, detailed in the relevant Schedule; and
  3. determine the criteria for awarding honours and to which programs this will apply. These are detailed in the relevant Schedule.

(12) Academic Senate will monitor program completions to ensure that the programs offered by the University continue to align with the strategic directions of the University as determined by the Council.

(13) The President of Academic Senate is authorised, on behalf of Academic Senate, to:

  1. amend program requirements on a case by case basis. Any such decisions will be reported to Academic Senate; and
  2. waive program requirements to grant a posthumous award. Any such decisions reported to Council.
Top of Page

Section 6 - Programs – Creation and Approval

(14) The Vice-Chancellor is authorised to approve the addition of new programs to the University profile.

(15) The Program and Course Approval Committee is authorised, on behalf of Academic Senate, to:

  1. approve the creation of new programs and will report any such decisions to Academic Senate.

(16) The Program and Course Approval Committee is responsible for ensuring that programs comply with the relevant University policies.

(17) The Program and Course Approval Committee will only consider proposals for new enabling programs, undergraduate and postgraduate coursework programs after approval has been granted by the Vice-Chancellor for the program to be included in the University profile.

(18) New programs must either be:

  1. an enabling program;
  2. linked to an existing award; or
  3. linked to a new award. In this case, the Program and Course Approval Committee may only provide in-principle approval that is subject to Council's approval of the establishment of the new award.

(19) Programs approved by the Program and Course Approval Committee will be recorded in the:

  1. Relevant schedule to these Rules, according to the type of qualification; and
  2. University of Newcastle AQF Qualification Register, in accordance with the AQF Qualifications Register Policy.
Top of Page

Section 7 - Programs – Quality Assurance

(20) The Academic Senate is responsible for ensuring that programs offered by the University, where appropriate, comply with the Australian Qualifications Framework including the:

  1. learning outcomes, graduate attributes and generic skills;
  2. quality assurance arrangements for each program including a system of review and audit; and
  3. development of policies and procedures relating to quality program management.
Top of Page

Section 8 - Programs – Pathways and Credit

(21) Academic Senate is authorised to approve policies and procedures to provide appropriate pathways and credit arrangements, ensuring that when credit is granted it:

  1. maintains the integrity of the qualification;
  2. is in the student’s best interest and that of their program; and
  3. is consistent with the credit provisions as listed within the relevant Schedule.
Top of Page

Section 9 - Program – Revision

(22) The Program and Course Approval Committee is authorised, on behalf of Academic Senate to:

  1. approve major and minor revisions to programs including changes to academic content, program structure and program requirements.

(23) The Program and Course Approval Committee is responsible for establishing a definition for major and minor program revisions.

(24) The Program and Course Approval Committee is required to ensure that revisions to programs:

  1. do not disadvantage continuing students; and
  2. comply with the Academic Senate approved cycle of program reviews.

(25) The Pro Vice-Chancellor of the Faculty is required to notify relevant Faculty(ies) and the Academic Registrar of any major revisions or variations to a program.

Top of Page

Section 10 - Programs – Maximum Time for Completion

(26) Academic Senate is authorised to prescribe the maximum time for completion of a program.

(27) The Program and Course Approval Committee is authorised, on behalf of Academic Senate, to approve exceptions to the maximum time for completion of a program, on advice from the relevant Faculty Board.

(28) The maximum time for completion of a program will be listed in the Maximum Time for Completion of Programs Schedule.

Top of Page

Section 11 - Programs – Leave

(29) Leave provisions are set out in the Rules Governing Admission and Enrolment and the Rules Governing Research Higher Degrees.

Top of Page

Section 12 - Programs – Student Progression

(30) Academic Senate is authorised to approve policies and procedures to assist student progression.

(31) The Faculty Progress and Appeals Committee is authorised, on behalf of Academic Senate, to apply sanctions for unsatisfactory academic performance by a student in a coursework program, including:

  1. restrictions on enrolment;
  2. suspension from a program or Faculty; and
  3. exclusion from a program or Faculty.

(32) The Deputy Vice-Chancellor (Academic) is authorised to consider and determine the outcome of any appeal against sanctions applied for unsatisfactory academic performance by a student in a coursework program.

Top of Page

Section 13 - Programs - Discontinuation

(33) Academic Senate is authorised to discontinue a program deemed no longer viable and will report any such decisions to Council.

(34) The Program and Course Approval Committee is authorised, on behalf of Academic Senate, to approve the discontinuation of a program on the recommendation from the appropriate committee:

  1. Research Committee for research programs;
  2. the relevant Faculty Board for undergraduate and postgraduate programs; or
  3. the relevant Faculty Boards for combined programs.

(35) Such decisions will be reported to Council via Academic Senate.

(36) Prior to approving the discontinuation of a program, the Program and Course Approval Committee is required to ensure that:

  1. students enrolled in the program are not disadvantaged;
  2. appropriate teach-out or alternative arrangements have been made for current students; and
  3. consideration is given to international applicants in accordance with the ESOS legislation.
Top of Page

Section 14 - Relaxing Provision

(37) To provide for exceptional circumstances arising in any particular case, the Chancellor and Vice-Chancellor, on the recommendation of the President of Academic Senate and a Deputy Vice-Chancellor, may relax any provision of these Rules except for the establishment and disestablishment of awards.