Comments

Document Feedback - Review and Comment

Step 1 of 4: Comment on Document

How to make a comment?

1. Use this Protected Document to open a comment box for your chosen Section, Part, Heading or clause.

2. Type your feedback into the comments box and then click "save comment" button located in the lower-right of the comment box.

3. Do not open more than one comment box at the same time.

4. When you have finished making comments proceed to the next stage by clicking on the "Continue to Step 2" button at the very bottom of this page.

 

Important Information

During the comment process you are connected to a database. Like internet banking, the session that connects you to the database may time-out due to inactivity. If you do not have JavaScript running you will recieve a message to advise you of the length of time before the time-out. If you have JavaScript enabled, the time-out is lengthy and should not cause difficulty, however you should note the following tips to avoid losing your comments or corrupting your entries:

  1. DO NOT jump between web pages/applications while logging comments.

  2. DO NOT log comments for more than one document at a time. Complete and submit all comments for one document before commenting on another.

  3. DO NOT leave your submission half way through. If you need to take a break, submit your current set of comments. The system will email you a copy of your comments so you can identify where you were up to and add to them later.

  4. DO NOT exit from the interface until you have completed all three stages of the submission process.

 

Micro-credentials Policy

Section 1 - Introduction

(1) The University of Newcastle (University) offers a range of courses for continuing professional development, pathways, academic skills, and executive education. These courses provide opportunities for learners seeking relevant knowledge and skills in smaller, more flexible, more accessible forms, and in a shorter period.

(2) Micro-credentials provide alternatives for reskilling, upskilling, and lifelong learning to support industry needs and also in some cases, to offer pathways for entry into award programs.

(3) This policy and the Micro-credentials Schedule draw upon information from the National Microcredentials Framework (Department of Education, Skills, and Employment).

Top of Page

Section 2 - Scope

(4) This policy applies to micro-credentials created and offered by the University.

(5) This Policy makes references to School and College structures and positions. Equivalent structures and positions may exist in Pathways and Academic Learning Support Centre and are referenced where relevant.

Top of Page

Section 3 - Purpose

(6) This policy outlines the University's approach to providing shorter forms of learning, and:

  1. establishes the principles for creating, approving, and quality assurance of the University's micro-credentials; 
  2. provides the University's standards and quality requirements for micro-credentials, including but not limited to portability, accessibility, coherence, and currency; and 
  3. establishes the unit value and credit recognition of the University's micro-credentials.
Top of Page

Section 4 - Principles

(7) The University will offer micro-credentials to: 

  1. support diversification of the University portfolio by catering to new types of learners who may not have previously considered studying at the University;
  2. provide education opportunities through partnerships with industry, employers, and professional associations;
  3. enable learners to diversify or enhance their skills and adapt to changing career opportunities driven by evolving industry and community needs; and
  4. engage learners in research-informed learning and align with the University's areas of research strength.

(8) In line with the National Microcredentials Framework, microcredentials may:

  1. contain assessable VET skillsets or units of competency;
  2. offer modularised assessed components of existing higher education curriculum or courses;
  3. offer industry learning that is assessed (such as but not limited to certifications); or
  4. offer other forms of assessed learning or competencies (for example, higher education or industry courses not currently accredited by a regulatory authority).

(9) The following are not considered suitable to be offered as a micro-credential:

  1. unassessed learning or courses, including work integrated learning that is not assessed;
  2. badges which are obtained through participation only (i.e. no assessment); or
  3. formal qualifications within the AQF and macrocredentials, including diplomas, certificates and masters degrees.

(10) The University of Newcastle’s micro-credentials should:

  1. primarily focus on acquiring skills to meet the needs of employers and/or industries;
  2. be either credit-bearing or non-credit bearing;

(11) Credit-bearing micro-credentials may:

  1. provide a pathway to a recognised award qualification offered by the University;
  2. be stacked to enable the granting of credit towards an award qualification;
  3. be delivered in different modes and formats to suit learner’s needs and preferences.

(12) Credit-bearing micro-credientials should align with the University's strategic goals and be financially viable.

(13) Credit-bearing micro-credentials should not normally be co-taught alongside award courses.

Top of Page

Section 5 - Approval

(14) The establishment of micro-credentials requires the approval of the relevant Pro Vice-Chancellor, who should receive a brief business case proposal that outlines the objectives, target market, and financial or strategic value of the initiative.

(15) Credit-bearing micro-credentials must be approved in accordance with the requirements for the establishment of a course as outlined in the Course Management and Assessment Manual and will be subject to the same approval processes as award courses.  

(16) Non-credit bearing micro-credentials must be approved by the relevant College Board.

(17) The establishment of micro-credentials that involve a third party require the approval of the Deputy Vice-Chancellor (Academic) and Vice President, following endorsement by the Portfolio Strategy Group (PSG) and must comply with the relevant provisions in the Global Partnership Framework and the Third Party Arrangements - Education Policy and Procedure, including provisions in relation to due diligence.

Top of Page

Section 6 - Quality Assurance

(18) Colleges are responsible for implementing robust oversight and management of academic, reputational, and commercial risks, and should consider impacts on existing offerings and revenue.

(19) The University's guidelines for teaching qualifications for delivery and coordination as outlined in the Appendices to the Course Management and Assessment Manual apply to the delivery of micro-credentials.

(20) Colleges must internally review each micro-credential every three years to determine if they should continue to be offered. The review must consider:

  1. financial viability;
  2. strategic value;
  3. alignment with market needs, industry skills and/or knowledge;
  4. student satisfaction; and
  5. student completion rates. 

(21) Micro-credentials that have been internally reviewed and are deemed unsatisfactory against the review criteria in Clause 17 should be discontinued or revised to address any identified issues.

(22) Colleges will provide an annual overview to Academic Senate of their credit bearing and non-credit bearing micro-credential offerings including current offerings and discontinued offerings.

Top of Page

Section 7 - Learner effort and credit recognition

(23) Learner effort for credit bearing micro-crednetials should be captured as units.

(24) Learner effort for non-credit bearing micro-credentials should be captured in hours and may include:

  1. online interactions;
  2. peer interactions;
  3. self-study; and
  4. assessment preparation.

(25) Decisions about Recognition of Prior Learning (RPL) of credit-bearing micro-credentials will be detailed in the Credit and Recognition of Prior Learning Policy.

(26) Credit-bearing micro-credentials can be used as part of a portfolio for admission, following defined pathways.

(27) Standard expectations for RPL apply, including an equivalency of learning outcomes, content, hours, and assessments.