Comments

Document Feedback - Review and Comment

Step 1 of 4: Comment on Document

How to make a comment?

1. Use this Protected Document to open a comment box for your chosen Section, Part, Heading or clause.

2. Type your feedback into the comments box and then click "save comment" button located in the lower-right of the comment box.

3. Do not open more than one comment box at the same time.

4. When you have finished making comments proceed to the next stage by clicking on the "Continue to Step 2" button at the very bottom of this page.

 

Important Information

During the comment process you are connected to a database. Like internet banking, the session that connects you to the database may time-out due to inactivity. If you do not have JavaScript running you will recieve a message to advise you of the length of time before the time-out. If you have JavaScript enabled, the time-out is lengthy and should not cause difficulty, however you should note the following tips to avoid losing your comments or corrupting your entries:

  1. DO NOT jump between web pages/applications while logging comments.

  2. DO NOT log comments for more than one document at a time. Complete and submit all comments for one document before commenting on another.

  3. DO NOT leave your submission half way through. If you need to take a break, submit your current set of comments. The system will email you a copy of your comments so you can identify where you were up to and add to them later.

  4. DO NOT exit from the interface until you have completed all three stages of the submission process.

 

Student Academic Integrity Policy

Section 1 - Introduction

(1) Academic integrity, honesty, and a respect for knowledge, truth and ethical practices are fundamental to the business of the University. These principles are at the core of all academic endeavour in teaching, learning and research. Dishonest practices contravene academic values, compromise the integrity of research and devalue the quality of learning.

(2) The Student Academic Integrity Policy has been developed in accordance with advice from the Independent Commission Against Corruption (ICAC).

(3) This policy must be read in conjunction with the Student Conduct Rule.

Top of Page

Section 2 - Policy Intent

(4) This policy is intended to reinforce the importance of integrity and honesty in an academic environment. This policy applies to all students of the University in all modes of study and in all locations, including undergraduate studentspostgraduate coursework students, and research higher degree candidates at all of the University's campuses.

Top of Page

Section 3 - Principles

(5) Regard for academic integrity is the responsibility of all staff and students of the University.

(6) To support academic integrity principles, all students are required to complete the Academic Integrity Module (AIM) within the first year of enrolment in a program

(7) The University may impose serious measures on students who are found to have breached this policy.

Top of Page

Section 4 - Responsibilities and Delegations

(8) All staff of the University are responsible for reinforcing high standards of academic integrity, and for reporting suspected breaches of this policy to the relevant Student Academic Conduct Officer (SACO) or Dean of Graduate Research.

(9) The following officers have particular responsibilities in relation to implementing the University's academic integrity and student academic misconduct procedures:-

  1. Program Convenors and Assistant Dean (Education) are responsible for ensuring that mechanisms are in place to provide students with education about academic integrity, including (but not limited to) compulsory Academic Integrity Module (AIM)s and the use of electronic text-matching software as a learning tool, where appropriate;
  2. Student Academic Conduct Officer (SACO)s are responsible for assessing cases of alleged academic dishonesty, for initiating appropriate action in accordance with the Student Conduct Rule and for ensuring relevant records are entered into the SMR;
  3. The Student Academic Conduct Officer Coordinator is a senior SACO appointed by the Deputy Vice-Chancellor (Academic) and Vice President. The SACO Coordinator works closely with SACO's to develop relevant training materials and resources, and to provide training and support for SACO's through workshops and consultations. The SACO Coordinator draws relevant issues to the attention of the Deputy Vice-Chancellor (Academic) and Vice President and provides advice to SACO's, Heads of School and Pro Vice-Chancellors on issues of concern; and
  4. The Pro Vice-Chancellor, Deputy Vice-Chancellor (Academic) and Vice President, or Dean of Graduate Research is responsible for making an assessment and determination of any misconduct issue that is escalated to them in accordance with the Student Conduct Rule.
Top of Page

Section 5 - Actions and Penalties

(10) If any form of student misconduct is found to have occurred, a range of actions may be taken or penalties imposed. Refer to Student Conduct Rule.

(11) Students under investigation for student academic misconduct, research misconduct, or other breaches of discipline will not be eligible to graduate until the matter is resolved under the provisions of the Student Conduct Rule.

(12) Before any penalties are applied to students enrolled in the Bachelor of Medicine (JMP) program, appropriate consultation must be held between Course/Unit Coordinators and SACO (University of Newcastle) and Head of School (University of New England).

Top of Page

Section 6 - Recording Outcomes

(13) Once a determination has been made on a misconduct matter, the relevant determining officer(s), as defined in the Student Conduct Rule, will document their decision and relevant conditions in imposing any penalty.

(14) The student will be informed in writing of the determination, as per the Student Conduct Rule.

(15) In cases of student academic misconduct, the relevant SACO will be responsible for ensuring relevant records are entered into the SMR and for ensuring that relevant staff within the University, as defined in the Student Conduct Rule, are informed of the decision.

(16) In cases of student research misconduct, Graduate Research will be responsible for ensuring relevant records are entered into the SMR, and for ensuring that relevant staff within the University, as defined in the Student Conduct Rule, are informed of the decision.

(17) Where a case of student academic misconduct or student research misconduct has been referred to another University officer for determination in accordance with the Student Conduct Rule, relevant records must be forwarded to the originating SACO (or, in the case of student research misconduct, to Graduate Research) for entry into the SMR and dissemination to other relevant staff.

Student Misconduct Register

(18) The University will maintain a Student Misconduct Register (SMR) as an internal register of all student misconduct, including academic, non-academic and research misconduct.

(19) Any student penalised as a result of a case of student academic misconduct, research misconduct, or other breach of discipline will have their name, the nature of the charge, and the penalty recorded on the SMR as a formal record of misconduct.

(20) When a SACO or other authorised officer places a record of academic misconduct, research misconduct or other breach of discipline on the SMR the student will be notified that this has occurred.

(21) Records regarding student academic misconduct, research misconduct, or other breaches of discipline must be added to the University's electronic document management system. All activity regarding misconduct and penalties that is recorded on the SMR will be de-identified after seven years and any associated hard-copy records of cases will be destroyed.

Top of Page

Section 7 - Appeals

(22) The procedure for appeals is outlined in the Student Conduct Rule.

Top of Page

Section 8 - Retrospectivity

(23) Where student academic misconduct or student research misconduct is detected after results have been finalised, the SACO or Dean of Graduate Research may open an investigation into serious cases of misconduct.